Différences
Ci-dessous, les différences entre deux révisions de la page.
| Les deux révisions précédentes Révision précédente Prochaine révision | Révision précédente | ||
|
en:pepite_2030_english_version [2018/06/20 16:47] user |
en:pepite_2030_english_version [2018/06/20 17:04] (Version actuelle) user [Workshop outputs] |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ligne 4: | Ligne 4: | ||
| - | The National Status Etudiant Entrepreneur, is accessible everywhere in France in one of the 29 PEPITE (Student Pole for Innovation, Transfer and Entrepreneurship) and it allows you to build and develop an entrepreneurial project as a student, whatever the entrepreneurial approach (individual, collective, economic and / or social purpose, innovative or not, technological or not, with creation of activities or takeover of business or other legal structure) . | + | The National Status Etudiant Entrepreneur, is accessible everywhere in France in one of the 29 PEPITE (Student Pole for Innovation, Transfer and Entrepreneurship) and it allows to build and develop an entrepreneurial project as a student, whatever the entrepreneurial approach (individual, collective, economic and / or social purpose, innovative or not, technological or not, with creation of activities or takeover of business or other legal structure) . |
| It is the PEPITE's Commitment Committee which is responsible for processing applications for the Ministry of Higher Education and Research. It is composed of the representatives of the PEPITE institutions, the pedagogical director of the Student-Entrepreneur Institution (D2E) and the PEPITE partners (support and funding structures, entrepreneurs, etc.). | It is the PEPITE's Commitment Committee which is responsible for processing applications for the Ministry of Higher Education and Research. It is composed of the representatives of the PEPITE institutions, the pedagogical director of the Student-Entrepreneur Institution (D2E) and the PEPITE partners (support and funding structures, entrepreneurs, etc.). | ||
| Ligne 10: | Ligne 10: | ||
| L’Ecole de design Nantes Atlantique was invited in June 2018 to lead a discussion with the representatives of PEPITE FRANCE and PEPITE in the region to project PEPITE 2030. This workshop highlights the challenges associated with supporting students from one of the reference poles in Europe. | L’Ecole de design Nantes Atlantique was invited in June 2018 to lead a discussion with the representatives of PEPITE FRANCE and PEPITE in the region to project PEPITE 2030. This workshop highlights the challenges associated with supporting students from one of the reference poles in Europe. | ||
| + | [[http://www.pepite-france.fr|PEPITE FRANCE website]] | ||
| ===== Description of the workshop : Introduce the methods of design thinking and think about the future of student entrepreneurship ===== | ===== Description of the workshop : Introduce the methods of design thinking and think about the future of student entrepreneurship ===== | ||
| Ligne 81: | Ligne 82: | ||
| * Prospective 2030: it will be better to clarify the stages and bricks of the project "until" 2030. Some groups have understood "from 2030". It would be a question of starting from a context and potential in 2030 (icebreaker) and to talk about the first changes to be made today to face this projected context. For professionals, some of the ideas projected were far from their daily lives (projected on 2030) and therefore difficult to implement. | * Prospective 2030: it will be better to clarify the stages and bricks of the project "until" 2030. Some groups have understood "from 2030". It would be a question of starting from a context and potential in 2030 (icebreaker) and to talk about the first changes to be made today to face this projected context. For professionals, some of the ideas projected were far from their daily lives (projected on 2030) and therefore difficult to implement. | ||
| * In terms of time management, some groups had difficulties finishing within the allotted time. The construction of user journey map has overflowed: it would have been better to define and exchange on the axes before the lunch break. | * In terms of time management, some groups had difficulties finishing within the allotted time. The construction of user journey map has overflowed: it would have been better to define and exchange on the axes before the lunch break. | ||
| - | * The meeting and the expertise of the PEPITE network could be remobilized within the framework of the AYCH project: they highlight the multiplicity of actors of the incubation and underline the importance of the positioning compared to the different actors ... | + | * The meeting and the expertise of the PEPITE network could be remobilized within the framework of the AYCH project: they highlight the multiplicity of actors of the incubation and underline the importance of the positioning of AYCH devices... |
