Différences
Ci-dessous, les différences entre deux révisions de la page.
| Les deux révisions précédentes Révision précédente Prochaine révision | Révision précédente Prochaine révision Les deux révisions suivantes | ||
|
en:abouttool [2018/11/02 10:53] user |
en:abouttool [2018/11/02 19:00] user |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ligne 1: | Ligne 1: | ||
| - | ====== Design cabinet toolkits - capitalising tools ====== | + | ====== Design tools ====== |
| - | A lot of things have already been written on toolkits. Here are some inspiring projects explaining the background of AYCH toolkits. There is also a presentation of the methodologies used. | + | AYCH path follows the design thinking process. We try to associate steps and tools, with open source tools (share alike 4.0). |
| - | + | L’approche du projet AYCH suit une méthodologie et un processus du design thinking. A chaque étape du processus est souvent associé un outil que nous cherchons à tester puis à transposer à l’échelle de chaque hub, en laissant des marges d’appropriation. Là encore, la difficulté tient à travailler étroitement avec les différents services pour définir des outils adaptés, adaptables et appropriables. Les outils sont diffusés sur une plate-forme (WIKI) et sont open source (share alike 4.0) et testés à l’occasion de creative jams ou encore d’ateliers réalisés et animés directement dans les hubs. Le test des outils fait l’objet de rapports complets dans la rubrique [[en:aychcases|AYCH cases]]. | |
| - | They take the form of a website with resources in .pdf (user manual and sheets and contents to print). This can be a source of inspiration. Or, on the contrary, a path not to follow, concerning the final form of the project. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | ==== Some examples :==== | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | * ** [[https://www.circulardesignguide.com/ | The Circular Design Guide]] **, meeting between the firm [[https://www.ideo.com | IDEO]] and the [[https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/ | Ellen MacArthur Foundation]]. It is an application of Design Thinking to the circular economy. As often, we find a global schema describing [[https://www.circulardesignguide.com/methods | the method]], [[https://www.circulardesignguide.com/resources | resources]] to apply this method, [[https://www.circulardesignguide.com/resources#casestudies | case studies]]. | + | |
| - | * ** [[https://www.frogdesign.com/work/frog-collective-action-toolkit | The Collective Action Tool Kit]] ** (pdf [[https://www.frogdesign.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/CAT_2.0_English.pdf | here]]) is for an audience non-professional, typically NGOs. It is not linear but proposes a series of activities synthesized in a notebook. Other link [[https://designmind.frogdesign.com/2016/03/the-collective-action-toolkit-quick-start-guide/ | right here]]. By the firm [[https://www.frogdesign.com/ | frog]]. | + | |
| - | * ** [[https://designthinkingforeducators.com/ | Design Thinking for Educator]] ** by [[https://www.ideo.com | IDEO]], a toolkit for primary school teachers, with as often a [[https://designthinkingforeducators.com/design-thinking/ | schema]] of the method and a notebook in [[https://education.uky.edu/nxgla/wp-content/uploads/sites/33/2016/11/Design-Thinking-for-Educators.pdf | pdf]]. | + | |
| - | * ** [[http://www.designkit.org/ | Design Kit: The Human-Centered Design Toolkit]] **, project from [[https://www.ideo.org/ | IDEO.org]], the "non-profit" of the IDEO firm: "At IDEO.org, we design products, services, and experiences to improve the lives of people in poor and vulnerable communities." The site in him -Even presents the [[http://www.designkit.org/methods | method and tools]] specific to user-centered design (note: almost the same as D.thinking), [[http://www.designkit.org/case-studies | case study]] and proposes different types of [[http://www.designkit.org/resources | resource]]): | + | |
| - | * The traditional [[http://www.designkit.org/resources/1 | pdf]] summary available in several languages | + | |
| - | * Links to online courses, in partnership with [[https://www.plusacumen.org/ | Acumen +]]. There is a [[http://www.designkit.org/resources/5 | general course]] and thematic courses to become a facilitator or to learn how to prototype. | + | |
| - | * A [[http://www.designkit.org/resources/9 | card game]] that you can buy on [[https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/581125890/design-kit-travel-pack | Kickstarter]] and that synthesizes all the tools of user centered design | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | ==== Thoughts: how we design the wiki ==== | + | |
| - | A website with .pdf resources implies that the user (s) is sufficiently autonomous. Users can be people who want to learn or develop a project, or people who want to use the methods and tools of D.thinking (or other) in a broader context (project management, teaching, etc.). We are not convinced that this is suitable for many people: person-to-person transmission is essential in this type of initiative. Example to support our words: the "fall" of Mooc for lack of human commitment; Simply: can you imagine a fablab without fabmanager? without a facilitator and with only the machines and documents to use them? The role of a trainer is paramount. | + | |
| + | |||
| + | De la méthode classique dite du double diamant… | ||
| + | … A une réinterprétation des outils avec les services jeunesse. | ||
