Différences

Ci-dessous, les différences entre deux révisions de la page.

Lien vers cette vue comparative

Les deux révisions précédentes Révision précédente
Prochaine révision 		Révision précédente
Prochaine révision Les deux révisions suivantes
en:abouttool [2018/11/02 10:33]
user 		en:abouttool [2018/11/04 14:02]
user
Ligne 1: Ligne 1:
-====== Design ​cabinet toolkits - capitalising ​tools ======+====== Design ​thinking ​tools ... only? ====== 
 +  
 +[[fr:​abouttoolsfr|version fr]]
  
-This is not the 999th website which will present THE methodology. ​This is an approach which aims to be particular to the context of youth service. +The steps of the AYCH process follow ​the methodology ​of design thinking. We combine ​the different steps and tools in open source version (share alike 4.0).
  
-This approach is based on AYCH case studies, but also on previous project already existing. Here are some inspiring projects explaining the background of AYCH toolkits. +{{ :​capture_d_e_cran_2018-11-02_a_19.01.48.png?600 | Double diamond design}} 
 +===== Hacker and designer appropriate and appropriable tools =====
  
 +Each stage of the process is associated with a tool that we test and then try to transpose to each hub, leaving margins of appropriation. The difficulty lies in working closely with the various services to define tools adapted, adaptable and appropriable by the youth services. The tools are distributed on this platform and are open source (share alike 4.0) and tested on the occasion of creative jams or workshops done and animated directly in the hubs. The tools test is fully reported in section [[:​aychcases| AYCHcases]].
  
-They take the form of a website with resources ​in .pdf (user manual ​and sheets ​and contents to print). This can be a source ​of inspiration. Or, on the contrary, a path not to follow, concerning ​the final form of the project.+At each stage of the process is often associated ​a tool that we seek to test and then transpose for of each hub, leaving margins of appropriation. Here again, the difficulty lies in working closely with the various services to define adapted, adaptable and appropriable tools for YOUNG SERVICES & people.  
 +The tools are broadcast on this platform and are open source ​(share alike 4.0) and tested during creative jams or workshops conducted ​and animated directly in the hubs. The testing of the tools is the subject of complete reports in the section [[en:​aychcases|AYCH cases]]. 
 + 
 + 
 +From the classic method called double diamond ... 
 + 
 +{{ :​en:​capture_d_e_cran_2018-11-03_a_18.27.56.png?​600 |}}  
 + 
 +... to a reinterpretation ​of tools with youth services. 
 + 
 +===== Reinterpretation of the tools: the role of the School of Design in the project ===== 
 + 
 +==== Tools designed and tested inside and outside hubs ==== 
 +  
 +Specific workshops have been held (at [[en: innochallege_april2018| Nantes]] and elsewhere, in different contexts such as the Innovation Challenge in Corsica) to improve the definition and portability of tools. 
 +These tools are simple and easy to access, like the production of simplified "​journey maps"​. 
 + 
 +These easily downloadable and usable tools were then tested and reused ​on the [[en:​brestmay2018|Brest hub]], but also tested in various contexts as in Corsica with the network of PEPITE (see [[en:​atelier_pepite_2030_-_version_fr| Atelier PÉPITE 2030]]). 
 +   
 + 
 + 
 +==== An approach around the game: the project ECHO FAB LAB ==== 
 +  
 +A project within the framework of the [[fr: echofablab | ECHOFABLAB]] project with a fab lab from Nantes (PING) enabled the development of a particular project around the issues of engagement of young people in difficulty in the design thinking process. Several tools have been developed with an ambition ​to go through the whole process, with an ambition to be on the theme of the game. 
 +