Différences

Ci-dessous, les différences entre deux révisions de la page.

Lien vers cette vue comparative

Les deux révisions précédentes Révision précédente
Prochaine révision 		Révision précédente
Prochaine révision Les deux révisions suivantes
en:abouttool [2018/11/02 10:33]
user 		en:abouttool [2018/11/04 13:37]
user
Ligne 1: Ligne 1:
-====== Design ​cabinet toolkits - capitalising ​tools ======+====== Design tools ====== 
 +[[fr:​abouttoolsfr|version fr]]
  
-This is not the 999th website which will present THE methodology. This is an approach which aims to be particular to the context of youth service. ​ 
  
-This approach is based on AYCH case studies, but also on previous project already existing. Here are some inspiring projects explaining the background of AYCH toolkits. +AYCH path follows the design thinking process. We try to associate steps and tools, with open source tools (share alike 4.0).
  
 +{{ :​capture_d_e_cran_2018-11-02_a_19.01.48.png?​600 |Design double diamond}}
  
-They take the form of a website with resources ​in .pdf (user manual ​and sheets ​and contents to print). This can be a source ​of inspiration. Or, on the contrary, a path not to follow, concerning ​the final form of the project.+At each stage of the process is often associated ​a tool that we seek to test and then transpose for of each hub, leaving margins of appropriation. Here again, the difficulty lies in working closely with the various services to define adapted, adaptable and appropriable tools for YOUNG SERVICES & people.  
 +The tools are broadcast on this platform and are open source ​(share alike 4.0) and tested during creative jams or workshops conducted ​and animated directly in the hubs. The testing ​of the tools is the subject ​of complete reports in the section [[en:​aychcases|AYCH cases]]. 
 + 
 + 
 +From the classic method called double diamond ... 
 + 
 +{{ :​en:​capture_d_e_cran_2018-11-03_a_18.27.56.png?​600 |}}  
 + 
 +... to a reinterpretation of tools with youth services. 
 +